The Armistice of 1850

The Armistice of 1850 With the belief of their young republics manifest destiny, and victory over Mexico in the Mexican-American War, the join give ins of America conquered most of the western sandwich portion of their continent. firearm obtaining large territories of land by and through victories from warfare and at the cost of bargained prices, this proud e res publica found itself with an immense crisis sitting deep down the palms of their distri simplyes. As the improvement of the linked States came through territorial gains, their exulting progress was met with digression.Although new territories were under the possession of the United States, m both leaders of this military unitful nation were shy(p) whether their newly acquired land was fit to be a filth of free bemire or thraldom. enchantment m all proposed arguments for pro- thralldom land, m whatever(prenominal) counter acted with free tarnish proposals and arguments. During the year of 1850, the United S tates of America lie withd to eternal sleep the tightness amongst those at opposite spectrums of this confrontation through the compromise of 1850.Before the passage of the compromise of 1850, many of the United States leaders found themselves at odds with nonpareil an early(a). John C. Calhoun, a publically known pro- bondage coitionman, believed that thrall should not hire been excluded from territories prior to admission to state hood. Calhoun thought that Congress did not subscribe to the designer to tone slavery in the nations newly acquired territories.In Calhouns Speech on the door path of California- and the General State of the kernel, he assesses the nature of the Union and the needs for its overall preservation. In the beginning of Calhouns speech, he clearly believed that the state of the Union was at harm due to its division, and was at the verge of striking disaster and disunion. Although Calhoun did not provide a closure for the unity of the country, h e did on the other hand argue that the world-beater of the Union rested upon the blue majority. At that time there was nearly a perfect equilibrium in the midst of the two, which afforded ample content to each to protect itself against the aggression of the other but, as it now stands, one section has the exclusive power of controlling the Government, which leaves the other with divulge any adequate subject matter of protecting itself against its encroachment and oppression, wrote Calhoun. Calhoun justified his opinion on the northeastward oppressing the South through the Souths deprivation of territory in the Northwest Ordinance, the bit Compromise, and the Oregon Territory.Calhoun, like the other representatives of the southern states, realized that the institution of slavery would either have to be fought for or the Union would eventually abolish it. It go out be found in the belief of the slew of the Southern States, as prevalent as the discontent itself, that they can not remain, as things now are, consistently with honor and safety, in the Union, stated the Congressman. Calhoun believed that the South had no via media to aim to the North, but only that of the Constitution.The Congressman placed the acc implement and the responsibility of the preservation of the nation within the Northerners hands. unlike to Calhouns view, Congressman David Wilmot believed that the institution of slavery should have been banned from all the newly acquired territory of the west. He was adamant that Congress possessed the power to regulate slavery in these new territories. David Wilmots Wilmot planning urged the banning of slavery within any territory acquired fromMexico from theMexican American Waror any territory acquired in the future. Provided,That, as an express and vestigial condition to the acquisition of any territory from the majority rule of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall premiere be duly convicted, wrote Wilmot. Although the Wilmot Proviso was an unsuccessful amendment, Wilmots view of free soil became a mass meeting point for opponents of slavery.Wilmot was adamant that all land gained within the United States of America should be free of slavery. While Calhoun and Wilmot demonstrated the extreme views of the pro-slavery South and the free soil North, the Compromise of 1850 managed to settle the sectioned divided views of Congress for the short term. TheCompromise of 1850was an amalgamation of eight searching orders which managed to ease the confrontation between thefree states of the North and the slave statesof theSouthin regards to the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War.The agree was drafted byKentucky Congressman,Henry carcass, in which av oidedSouthern secession, lessen sectional conflict, and prevented civil war. The Compromise of 1850 allowed for California to be admitted as one of the States of the Union, as long as it was a free state. It also banned slavery in Washington D. C. Resolved, That it is inexpedient to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. This compromise also make Texas surrender its border to the Rio del Norte to New Mexico, and allowed Texas to transfer its debt to that the interior(a) government.The Compromise of1850 also prohibited Congress from introducing or excluding slavery from the nations newly acquired territory, and request that the territorial governments were to decide upon the issue of slavery. In other words, the new territories actions on the institution of slavery came from prevalent sovereignty. Although slave trade was prohibited from Washington D. C. , the compromise managed to preserve slavery, while demanding for the restitution and delivery of persons leaping to se rvice or labor in any State, who may escape into any other State or Territory in the Union.Northerners became incense of the idea that runaway slaves, upon capture, were to be returned to their masters of the South. This source became known as The Fugitive Slave doing of 1850. This act became the sole prize of the South for their compromise in allowing the admission of California to be a free state. Not only did the South manage to keep their traditional ways of enslaving Africans, or African Americans, but they also managed to gain more power over their slaves.While many viewed the Compromise of 1850 with pleasure, William Seward oppose Clays compromise which managed to cause momentary calm within the Union. Seward found discontent with the compromise because it was founded on many unconstitutional grounds. Seward believed that the states were unequal due to slavery, and that slavery should not exist. He thought that slavery was unconstitutional whether classified as property or not, because it is (was) contradictory to the law of nature and of nations. In no way did Seward find the compromise constitutional because he matte up slavery was unconstitutional.On the flip side, Henry Clay believed that the Compromise of 1850 was a chance for his nation to become reunited. He demonstrated this by addressing the president in A General Review of the debate on the Compromise Bills by stating, I believe from the bottom of my soul, that the prevention is the re-union of this Union. I believe that it is the dove of peace, which, taking its joyous flight from the dome of the capitol, carries the glad tidings of insure peace and restored harmony to all the remotest extremities of this distracted land. Its clear that Clay believed the compromise was drawn out for the betterment of his young nation, in hopes that it would reconcile their sectional differences, and become one whole nation again. In 1850, many believed that the Compromise of 1850 had solved the sect ional conflicts between the Northern free-soilers and the Southern slave holders. Although there were those who opposed the compromise, for the time being it managed to ease the tension between a divided nation.Although the Compromise of 1850 was an act in which all parties had to give up important ground, it allowed the nation to momentarily fade into bliss for a couplet of years. Its hard to believe that the expansionists of our country would have predicted these problems while trying to improve our country. Our nations manifest destiny at the time seemed to be the answer to improve upon a young nation, but the newly acquired territories from Mexico only stirred up thick emotions and caused for greater division within the nation. Although the Compromise of 1850 managed to ease tension, it ultimately did not cease sectional conflict.